In our Amsterdam to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 24 minutes, completing the 811km route in 8h 28min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 28min (24 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~149 kWh
- Distance: 811km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 28min |
8h 52min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
44min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~146 kWh |
~146 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Euro Rastpark Waldlaubersheim (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Ettenheim-West (10 min, 11% → 54%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle Gewerbepark (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (14 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Renchtal West (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
GOFAST Basel-Ost (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 24-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 811km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons