In our Amsterdam to Bern EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 3 minutes, completing the 812km route in 8h 49min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge's 363km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 8h 49min (3 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~159 kWh
- Distance: 812km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
8h 52min |
8h 49min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
41min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~146 kWh |
~146 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle Gewerbepark (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (14 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Renchtal West (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
GOFAST Basel-Ost (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Peppenhoven West (10 min, 19% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Mahlberg West (15 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 3-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 812km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons