In our Amsterdam to Bern EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 8 minutes, completing the 811km route in 8h 49min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The VW ID. Buzz Pro LR's 389km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 8h 49min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~159 kWh
- Distance: 811km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
smart #1 Pro |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
| Travel time |
8h 49min |
8h 57min |
| Charging time: |
41min |
49min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~146 kWh |
~146 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Peppenhoven West (10 min, 19% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Mahlberg West (15 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bern
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Westfalen Tankstelle Ludwig-Erhard Straße (10 min, 13% → 40%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (16 min, 12% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Renchtal West (13 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
GOFAST Basel-Ost (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 8-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 811km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~159 kWh vs ~179 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons