In our Amsterdam to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 76 minutes, completing the 2215km route in 22h 32min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 32min (76 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~361 kWh
- Distance: 2215km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
22h 32min |
23h 48min |
| Charging time: |
1h 13min |
2h 29min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~399 kWh |
~397 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
EWE Go McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Medenbach West (10 min, 17% → 41%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (15 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
AVIA Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (17 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
da emobil Burger King Gaudenzdorfer Gürtel (12 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bábolna (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (14 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
MOL Szent Gellért pihenőhely (28 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (28 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 76-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 2215km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 2h 29min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~361 kWh vs ~385 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons