In our Amsterdam to Copenhagen EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 8 minutes, completing the 764km route in 9h 25min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 9h 25min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~150 kWh
- Distance: 764km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
9h 33min |
9h 25min |
| Charging time: |
47min |
35min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~138 kWh |
~137 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Telekom Emsteker Straße, Cloppenburg (16 min, 20% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Selgros Öjendorf, Hamburg (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
bft Willer, Gremersdorf (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Infoteria Farø, Bogø By (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Copenhagen
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Cloppenburg Autohof, Cloppenburg (10 min, 24% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Leonardo Hotel Hamburg-Stillhorn, Hamburg (15 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Clever Erhvervspark, Maribo (10 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Copenhagen
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 8-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 764km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons