In our Amsterdam to Helsinki EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 30 minutes, completing the 2124km route in 29h 29min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 29h 29min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 3h 31min
- Energy: ~335 kWh
- Distance: 2124km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
29h 29min |
29h 59min |
| Charging time: |
3h 31min |
3h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~382 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
PENNY (28 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
REWE Conrad-Tack-Ring (22 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
Avia Wojska Polskiego (25 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
N-Park (25 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Kwiatowa (35 min, 10% → 94%)
-
Stop 6:
Vilniaus (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Girelė (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Neste (40 min, 10% → 100%)
-
Stop 9:
Alexela Saku (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Allego Werre-Park (27 min, 11% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
REWE Conrad-Tack-Ring (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Avia Wojska Polskiego (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Rossmann Graniczna (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Żwirki i Wigury (27 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 6:
Lidl (41 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
Vilniaus (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Girelė (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Pulkveža Brieža (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 10:
Rannahotell (28 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 11:
Alexela Saku (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 30-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 2124km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 3h 31min vs 3h 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~335 kWh vs ~387 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons