In our Amsterdam to Munich EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Tesla Model X 2023 by 30 minutes, completing the 834km route in 8h 13min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model X 2023's 460km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 8h 13min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 23min
- Energy: ~147 kWh
- Distance: 834km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model X 2023 |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
8h 43min |
8h 13min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
23min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~150 kWh |
~148 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model X 2023 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Autohof Dachsberg (19 min, 33% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (24 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße (10 min, 10% → 28%)
- Arrival: Munich
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bad Camberg West (13 min, 23% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Fernmeldeturm (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 30-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 2023 on this 834km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 23min vs 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~147 kWh vs ~172 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons