In our Amsterdam to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 75 minutes, completing the 1632km route in 16h 51min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 51min (75 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~300 kWh
- Distance: 1632km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 51min |
18h 6min |
| Charging time: |
57min |
2h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~294 kWh |
~294 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Euro Rastpark Waldlaubersheim, Waldlaubersheim (10 min, 18% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Park & Ride Pendlerparkplatz, Riegel am Kaiserstuhl (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Amsteg, Silenen (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Osteria De'Giusti, Ciliegi (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Peppenhoven West, Rheinbach (13 min, 17% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle, Alzey (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Renchtal West, Appenweier (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
GOFAST Basel-Ost, Basel (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Amsteg, Silenen (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
GOFAST Swissminiatur, Melide (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Secchia Ovest, Modena (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 10:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 75-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1632km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 2h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons