In our Amsterdam to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 by 18 minutes, completing the 2113km route in 21h 10min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 10min (18 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~345 kWh
- Distance: 2113km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 |
| Travel time |
21h 10min |
21h 28min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
1h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (11 min, 15% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Seidl Confiserie (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Trieben (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (20 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bad Camberg West (11 min, 11% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY 24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (10 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
Smatrics Pendlerparkplatz (10 min, 14% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Dobrenje Zahod (12 min, 16% → 84%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 10% → 97%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 18-minute advantage over XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 2113km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~345 kWh vs ~415 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons