In our Amsterdam to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ by 108 minutes, completing the 2113km route in 20h 58min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 58min (108 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 21min
- Energy: ~329 kWh
- Distance: 2113km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ |
| Travel time |
20h 58min |
22h 46min |
| Charging time: |
1h 21min |
2h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~380 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Seidl Confiserie (12 min, 13% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Trieben (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV A1 (30 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Oberhonnefeld (18 min, 26% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Haidt Süd (32 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (20 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Raststation Kammern (25 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (29 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (11 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (39 min, 10% → 97%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 108-minute advantage over Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ on this 2113km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 21min vs 2h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~329 kWh vs ~349 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons