In our Amsterdam to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 65 minutes, completing the 2113km route in 21h 38min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 38min (65 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 46min
- Energy: ~379 kWh
- Distance: 2113km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
21h 38min |
22h 43min |
| Charging time: |
1h 46min |
2h 21min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bad Camberg West (10 min, 17% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Gremsdorf (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 18% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle Rottbitze (11 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
AVIA Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Smatrics Ladepark wild & bolz eMotel (11 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Dobrenje Zahod (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (14 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 16% → 55%)
-
Stop 11:
JP Putevi Srbije (15 min, 23% → 72%)
-
Stop 12:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (17 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 65-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 2113km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 46min vs 2h 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~379 kWh vs ~414 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons