In our Amsterdam to Sofia EV duel, the BMW i5 eDrive40 beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 121 minutes, completing the 2116km route in 22h 15min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model S 2023's 505km range doesn't beat the BMW i5 eDrive40's 465km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The BMW i5 eDrive40 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
BMW i5 eDrive40
- Total time: 22h 15min (121 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 7min
- Energy: ~364 kWh
- Distance: 2116km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
BMW i5 eDrive40 |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
22h 15min |
24h 16min |
| Charging time: |
2h 7min |
3h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~381 kWh |
~383 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
BMW i5 eDrive40 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Medenbach West (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (10 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Seidl Confiserie (11 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (23 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Martinci (28 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 8:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (22 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Medenbach West (17 min, 13% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (10 min, 10% → 29%)
-
Stop 3:
Circle K Autohof Tennenlohe (10 min, 10% → 29%)
-
Stop 4:
Total Tankstelle (34 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Kulturhaus Römerfeld (32 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesla Supercharger (12 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Shell (27 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 8:
Toll Station (29 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger IKEA (16 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Bosphorus Hotel (16 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the BMW i5 eDrive40 Won
The BMW i5 eDrive40 achieved a 121-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2116km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 7min vs 3h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~364 kWh vs ~398 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons