In our Amsterdam to Tallinn EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 37 minutes, completing the 2034km route in 26h 31min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 26h 31min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 3h 25min
- Energy: ~321 kWh
- Distance: 2034km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
26h 31min |
27h 8min |
| Charging time: |
3h 25min |
3h 50min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~366 kWh |
~365 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
PENNY (28 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
REWE Conrad-Tack-Ring (22 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
Avia Wojska Polskiego (25 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
N-Park (25 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Kwiatowa (35 min, 10% → 94%)
-
Stop 6:
Vilniaus (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Girelė (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Circle K Purvciems (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
Rannahotell (26 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Allego Werre-Park (27 min, 11% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
REWE Conrad-Tack-Ring (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Avia Wojska Polskiego (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Rossmann Graniczna (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Żwirki i Wigury (27 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 6:
Lidl (41 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
Vilniaus (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Girelė (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Pulkveža Brieža (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 10:
Rannahotell (29 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 11:
Mustamäe Tervisekeskus (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 37-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 2034km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 3h 25min vs 3h 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~321 kWh vs ~371 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons