In our Amsterdam to Zagreb EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 18 minutes, completing the 1336km route in 14h 13min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 14h 13min (18 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 42min
- Energy: ~211 kWh
- Distance: 1336km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 31min |
14h 13min |
| Charging time: |
1h 57min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~240 kWh |
~240 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Königsforst West (12 min, 13% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bad Camberg West (16 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Euro Hotel (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Gremsdorf (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
EWE Go McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Süd (10 min, 12% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
Turmöl Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Raststation Kammern (13 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Dobrenje Zahod (15 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Gremsdorf (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
AVIA Tankstelle (19 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation Kammern (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Dobrenje Zahod (12 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 18-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1336km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 42min vs 1h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~211 kWh vs ~226 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons