In our Athens to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 99 minutes, completing the 2312km route in 23h 42min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 42min (99 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 38min
- Energy: ~377 kWh
- Distance: 2312km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
23h 42min |
25h 21min |
| Charging time: |
1h 38min |
3h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~416 kWh |
~417 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Korinos dir Thessaloniki (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (34 min, 12% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Zemun Park (12 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Lamačská cesta (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Hansastraße (10 min, 14% → 45%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (10 min, 50% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Korinos dir Thessaloniki (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol A1 (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (14 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (34 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Zemun Park (32 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 8:
Páty Nord (16 min, 12% → 54%)
-
Stop 9:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
OC Karlov (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 11:
Burger King Kutnohorská (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 12:
Esso Tankstelle (17 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 99-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2312km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 38min vs 3h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~377 kWh vs ~428 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons