In our Athens to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 119 minutes, completing the 2363km route in 25h 56min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 56min (119 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 2min
- Energy: ~434 kWh
- Distance: 2363km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
| Travel time |
25h 56min |
27h 55min |
| Charging time: |
2h 2min |
3h 56min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~425 kWh |
~427 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (17 min, 15% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (37 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesla Supercharger (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (16 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Novate Nord (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bern
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (10 min, 44% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (23 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol A1 (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (18 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (41 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV A1 (22 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesla Supercharger (24 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 8:
Emmezeta Jankomir (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
Barje Sever (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 10:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 11:
Supercharger Crowne Plaza Hotel (17 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 12:
Electra Via Carlo Cattaneo (27 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 13:
GoFast McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 39%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 119-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 2363km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 2min vs 3h 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~434 kWh vs ~522 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons