In our Athens to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 46 minutes, completing the 2363km route in 26h 4min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 4min (46 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 10min
- Energy: ~424 kWh
- Distance: 2363km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
26h 4min |
26h 50min |
| Charging time: |
2h 10min |
2h 55min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~425 kWh |
~427 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (19 min, 13% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (39 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesla Supercharger (13 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (17 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 7:
Novate Nord (14 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Bern
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (10 min, 38% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (12 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (30 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV A1 (15 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesla Supercharger (17 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
Petrol (10 min, 18% → 56%)
-
Stop 10:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 13% → 53%)
-
Stop 11:
Ricarica Limenella Nord (13 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 12:
Electra Via Carlo Cattaneo (13 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 13:
Supercharger Centro Calzaturiero (12 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 46-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 2363km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 10min vs 2h 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~424 kWh vs ~463 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons