In our Athens to Bratislava EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 24 minutes, completing the 1657km route in 18h 24min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 28, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 18h 24min (24 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 35min
- Energy: ~261 kWh
- Distance: 1657km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
18h 24min |
18h 48min |
| Charging time: |
2h 35min |
2h 39min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~298 kWh |
~301 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (13 min, 36% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (21 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol A1 (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (17 min, 12% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (31 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Zemun Park (35 min, 10% → 94%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Páty Nord (18 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (13 min, 38% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (29 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
JP Putevi Srbije (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV smer Beograd (32 min, 17% → 79%)
-
Stop 8:
Kecskemét északi (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell Tópark (19 min, 13% → 66%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 24-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1657km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 35min vs 2h 39min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~261 kWh vs ~302 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons