In our Athens to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 64 minutes, completing the 1142km route in 13h 57min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 57min (64 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~186 kWh
- Distance: 1142km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
13h 57min |
15h 1min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
1h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~206 kWh |
~206 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Korinos dir Thessaloniki (20 min, 18% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
Petrol (22 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (11 min, 41% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
FINES (12 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Petrol (30 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (28 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 64-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1142km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 1h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~186 kWh vs ~189 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons