In our Athens to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 33 minutes, completing the 1219km route in 23h 23min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 23min (33 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~190 kWh
- Distance: 1219km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
23h 23min |
23h 56min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
1h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~219 kWh |
~220 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Xenos (49 min, 24% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Murge Est (23 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Xenos (66 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
Q8 SS Adriatica (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Calaggio Nord (12 min, 17% → 68%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 33-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1219km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 1h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~190 kWh vs ~224 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons