In our Athens to Rome EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 27 minutes, completing the 1251km route in 24h 19min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 24h 19min (27 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 54min
- Energy: ~197 kWh
- Distance: 1251km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
24h 46min |
24h 19min |
| Charging time: |
2h 15min |
1h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~225 kWh |
~222 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Epirus Plaza (11 min, 31% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
DEI Blue Kapsiochas (29 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Rruga Skënderbeu (34 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
Q8 easy Via Appia (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
Q8 SS Adriatica (10 min, 13% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Ewiva McGallon (10 min, 12% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Calaggio Nord (10 min, 11% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
ROA (10 min, 11% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Casilina Est (11 min, 16% → 47%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Sklavenitis Supermarket (17 min, 37% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Xenos (42 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
Q8 easy Via Appia (17 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Ewiva McGallon (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
ROA (19 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 27-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1251km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 54min vs 2h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~197 kWh vs ~212 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons