In our Athens to Sofia EV duel, the BMW i5 eDrive40 beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 24 minutes, completing the 807km route in 8h 38min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance's 524km range doesn't beat the BMW i5 eDrive40's 465km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The BMW i5 eDrive40 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
BMW i5 eDrive40
- Total time: 8h 38min (24 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 22min
- Energy: ~139 kWh
- Distance: 807km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
BMW i5 eDrive40 |
| Travel time |
9h 2min |
8h 38min |
| Charging time: |
32min |
22min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~145 kWh |
~142 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (12 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Hotel City Sandanski (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell (10 min, 24% → 45%)
- Arrival: Sofia
BMW i5 eDrive40 Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (12 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
FINES (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the BMW i5 eDrive40 Won
The BMW i5 eDrive40 achieved a 24-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 807km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 22min vs 32min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~139 kWh vs ~145 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons