In our Athens to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 41 minutes, completing the 1483km route in 15h 53min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 53min (41 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 18min
- Energy: ~272 kWh
- Distance: 1483km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
15h 53min |
16h 34min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
2h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~267 kWh |
~268 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (17 min, 15% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (37 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (11 min, 41% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol (16 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (35 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV A1 (18 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesla Supercharger (19 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 41-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1483km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 18min vs 2h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons