In our Belgrade to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 45 minutes, completing the 1225km route in 12h 1min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 1min (45 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~200 kWh
- Distance: 1225km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
12h 1min |
12h 46min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
1h 21min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~221 kWh |
~220 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bábolna (11 min, 14% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
OC Karlov (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
SachsenEnergie City Center (10 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lajosmizse pihenőhely kelet (17 min, 13% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Győr (12 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Ladná směr Brno (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
OC Karlov (11 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Burger King Kutnohorská (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Esso Tankstelle (18 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 45-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1225km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 1h 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~200 kWh vs ~202 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons