In our Belgrade to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 4 minutes, completing the 1275km route in 13h 28min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 28min (4 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~198 kWh
- Distance: 1275km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
13h 28min |
13h 32min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
42min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~230 kWh |
~232 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (10 min, 16% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Novate Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 38% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Novate Nord (11 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 4-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1275km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~198 kWh vs ~208 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons