In our Belgrade to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 12 minutes, completing the 1683km route in 16h 9min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 9min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~275 kWh
- Distance: 1683km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 9min |
16h 21min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
1h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~303 kWh |
~303 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger King Cross (10 min, 24% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Emmezeta Jankomir (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Shopping City Seiersberg (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Smatrics Pendlerparkplatz (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Mer McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 12-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1683km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 1h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~275 kWh vs ~302 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons