In our Belgrade to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 33 minutes, completing the 2107km route in 27h 30min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 27h 30min (33 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 23min
- Energy: ~328 kWh
- Distance: 2107km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
27h 30min |
28h 3min |
| Charging time: |
1h 23min |
1h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~379 kWh |
~379 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tesco (12 min, 27% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (16 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Neste (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 19% → 59%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tesco (22 min, 13% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell MOP East (10 min, 16% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (19 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (26 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (12 min, 11% → 64%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 33-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2107km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 23min vs 1h 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~328 kWh vs ~387 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons