In our Belgrade to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 14 minutes, completing the 2210km route in 25h 3min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 3min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 7min
- Energy: ~344 kWh
- Distance: 2210km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
25h 17min |
25h 3min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
1h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~398 kWh |
~397 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bábolna (11 min, 14% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
OC Karlov (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Bergstraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststätte Recknitz Ost (10 min, 26% → 63%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 12% → 63%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Pávov Sever (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Circle K Tappernøje Øst (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 2210km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 7min vs 1h 16min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~344 kWh vs ~361 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons