In our Belgrade to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 70 minutes, completing the 2210km route in 25h 17min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 17min (70 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~361 kWh
- Distance: 2210km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
25h 17min |
26h 27min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
2h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~398 kWh |
~399 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bábolna (11 min, 14% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
OC Karlov (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Bergstraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststätte Recknitz Ost (10 min, 26% → 63%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 12% → 63%)
- Arrival: Oslo
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 14% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (12 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
OC Karlov (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Burger King Kutnohorská (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Esso Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
HPC McDonald's Alboinstraße (13 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (11 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 9:
Burger King (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 11:
McDonald's (16 min, 11% → 69%)
-
Stop 12:
Tradenvägen (15 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 70-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 2210km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 2h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~361 kWh vs ~433 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons