In our Belgrade to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 74 minutes, completing the 1765km route in 17h 20min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 20min (74 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 54min
- Energy: ~288 kWh
- Distance: 1765km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
17h 20min |
18h 34min |
| Charging time: |
54min |
2h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~318 kWh |
~321 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Eisentratten (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
REWE Nymphenburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Adolf-Seebacher-Straße (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (19 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Avtocestno počivališče Radovljica Sever (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Genussplatzl Eben - Imbiss, Fleisch & Wurst (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Samerberg Nord (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Stadtbäcker Scharold (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle Margarete-Steiff-Straße (16 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Keskastel Est (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (19 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 74-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1765km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 54min vs 2h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~288 kWh vs ~327 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons