In our Belgrade to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 37 minutes, completing the 1713km route in 20h 11min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 11min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~267 kWh
- Distance: 1713km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
20h 11min |
20h 48min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
1h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~308 kWh |
~308 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tesco (12 min, 27% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (16 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tesco (22 min, 13% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell MOP East (10 min, 16% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (19 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (24 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 37-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1713km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 1h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~267 kWh vs ~314 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons