In our Belgrade to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Extended Range AWD by 32 minutes, completing the 1265km route in 12h 24min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 24min (32 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~206 kWh
- Distance: 1265km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Extended Range AWD |
| Travel time |
12h 24min |
12h 56min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
1h 0min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~228 kWh |
~228 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (14 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
Ford Capri Extended Range AWD Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Porsche Croatia (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Barje Sever (13 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (20 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Osteria De'Giusti (17 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 32-minute advantage over Ford Capri Extended Range AWD on this 1265km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 1h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~206 kWh vs ~217 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons