In our Berlin to Amsterdam EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 8 minutes, completing the 661km route in 6h 55min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 6h 55min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 36min
- Energy: ~104 kWh
- Distance: 661km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
7h 3min |
6h 55min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
36min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~119 kWh |
~119 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
KFC, Isernhagen (13 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Grönegau Nord, Melle (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's, Bad Bentheim (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned de Hucht, Ugchelen (10 min, 11% → 41%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Magic Spielhalle, Garbsen (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
WSO Sicherheitsdienst, Osnabrück (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Tango Vundelaar, Wilp (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 8-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 661km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 36min vs 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~104 kWh vs ~112 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons