In our Berlin to Bern EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 13 minutes, completing the 917km route in 9h 34min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 9h 34min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~205 kWh
- Distance: 917km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 34min |
9h 47min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
53min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~165 kWh |
~167 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (16 min, 13% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Hohenlohe Nord (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Frankenwald West (10 min, 16% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 19% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Schönbuch West (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (13 min, 13% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 13-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 917km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons