In our Berlin to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 by 76 minutes, completing the 1674km route in 17h 32min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 32min (76 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~273 kWh
- Distance: 1674km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
17h 32min |
18h 48min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
2h 6min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~301 kWh |
~301 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Greenway Bory Mall (10 min, 18% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Hansastraße (11 min, 45% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (12 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
MOL Zeleňák - Bratislava (15 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Győr (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (23 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 6:
Rompetrol A1 Sagu Sens Timisoara (24 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (18 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Pitesti Retail Park (10 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 76-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 on this 1674km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 2h 6min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~273 kWh vs ~292 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons