In our Berlin to Budapest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 31 minutes, completing the 858km route in 8h 25min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 25min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 17min
- Energy: ~134 kWh
- Distance: 858km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 25min |
8h 56min |
| Charging time: |
17min |
50min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~154 kWh |
~154 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OC Karlov (17 min, 14% → 75%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Bahnhof Neustadt (12 min, 46% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (12 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
MOL Zeleňák - Bratislava (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 858km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 17min vs 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~134 kWh vs ~142 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons