In our Berlin to Dublin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi SQ6 e-tron by 17 minutes, completing the 1667km route in 19h 32min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 32min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~259 kWh
- Distance: 1667km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi SQ6 e-tron |
| Travel time |
19h 32min |
19h 49min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
1h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~300 kWh |
~301 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Ladepark L´Osteria (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Oud-Turnhout Noord (14 min, 24% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Village Hotel (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 12% → 20%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Audi SQ6 e-tron Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (10 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Channel Gateway (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (13 min, 16% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (12 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 17-minute advantage over Audi SQ6 e-tron on this 1667km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 1h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~259 kWh vs ~328 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons