In our Berlin to Munich EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 9 minutes, completing the 587km route in 5h 51min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 5h 51min (9 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 29min
- Energy: ~92 kWh
- Distance: 587km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
6h 0min |
5h 51min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
29min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~106 kWh |
~106 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof, Lederhose (10 min, 20% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Rastplatz Sophienberg Ost, Bayreuth (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Esso Tankstelle, Greding (12 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Frankenwald West, Berg (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Schnaittach (19 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 9-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 587km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 29min vs 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~92 kWh vs ~99 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons