In our Berlin to Oslo EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 14 minutes, completing the 990km route in 13h 47min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55's 480km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 13h 47min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~156 kWh
- Distance: 990km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 1min |
13h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 28min |
1h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~178 kWh |
~178 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parkplatz P2 Seehafen (10 min, 34% → 41%)
-
Stop 2:
Burger King (17 min, 15% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Barbecue barn (16 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (12 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Tradenvägen (12 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Alvim (10 min, 10% → 35%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parkplatz P2 Seehafen (10 min, 28% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Burger King (13 min, 16% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Circle K Kongevejen (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 14-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 990km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 1h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~156 kWh vs ~219 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons