In our Berlin to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 5 minutes, completing the 1049km route in 10h 9min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 9min (5 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 27min
- Energy: ~171 kWh
- Distance: 1049km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
10h 9min |
10h 14min |
| Charging time: |
27min |
33min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~189 kWh |
~189 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Euro Rastpark, Lippetal (17 min, 17% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord, Le Rœulx (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg, Porta Westfalica (12 min, 24% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord, Eschweiler (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest, La Sentinelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 5-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1049km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 27min vs 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~171 kWh vs ~188 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons