In our Berlin to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 59 minutes, completing the 1048km route in 10h 4min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 4min (59 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 22min
- Energy: ~163 kWh
- Distance: 1048km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
10h 4min |
11h 3min |
| Charging time: |
22min |
1h 16min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~189 kWh |
~190 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Lichtendorf Nord, Dortmund (12 min, 15% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord, Le Rœulx (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
HEM Tankstelle Lahe, Hannover (15 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus Weber, Beckum (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
Remscheid West, Remscheid (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shell Eupen, Baelen (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord, Le Rœulx (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Syrest, Roye (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 59-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1048km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 22min vs 1h 16min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~163 kWh vs ~167 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons