In our Berlin to Paris EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 52 minutes, completing the 1056km route in 10h 11min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023
- Total time: 10h 11min (52 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~158 kWh
- Distance: 1056km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 |
| Travel time |
11h 3min |
10h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
30min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~190 kWh |
~189 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
HEM Tankstelle Lahe, Hannover (15 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus Weber, Beckum (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
Remscheid West, Remscheid (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shell Eupen, Baelen (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord, Le Rœulx (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Syrest, Roye (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Paris
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg, Porta Westfalica (10 min, 35% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord, Eschweiler (10 min, 12% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest, La Sentinelle (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Won
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 achieved a 52-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1056km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 1h 16min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~158 kWh vs ~168 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons