In our Berlin to Paris EV duel, the smart #1 Pro+ beats the SsangYong Korando e-Motion by 59 minutes, completing the 1056km route in 10h 59min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+ needs only 6 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro+
- Total time: 10h 59min (59 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 11min
- Energy: ~193 kWh
- Distance: 1056km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
smart #1 Pro+ |
SsangYong Korando e-Motion |
| Travel time |
10h 59min |
11h 58min |
| Charging time: |
1h 11min |
2h 8min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~190 kWh |
~190 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Magic Spielhalle, Garbsen (13 min, 12% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus Weber, Beckum (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Remscheid West, Remscheid (10 min, 12% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shell Eupen, Baelen (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord, Le Rœulx (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Syrest, Roye (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Paris
SsangYong Korando e-Motion Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Autohof, Schwülper (17 min, 13% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg, Porta Westfalica (13 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
Autohaus Weber, Beckum (16 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Remscheid West, Remscheid (11 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle, Düren (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Aire de Tignée Nord, Soumagne (21 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Q8 Le Rœulx Nord, Le Roeulx (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest, La Sentinelle (13 min, 13% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Syrest, Roye (17 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the smart #1 Pro+ Won
The smart #1 Pro+ achieved a 59-minute advantage over SsangYong Korando e-Motion on this 1056km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 11min vs 2h 8min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~193 kWh vs ~218 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons