In our Berlin to Paris EV duel, the Tesla Model S 75 beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 35 minutes, completing the 1052km route in 13h 30min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 17,430 less, the Tesla Model S 75 beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 35 minutes on this route.
The Tesla Model S 90's 330km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model S 75's 280km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model S 75 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model S 75
- Total time: 13h 30min (35 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 3h 33min
- Energy: ~244 kWh
- Distance: 1052km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model S 75 |
Tesla Model S 90 |
| Travel time |
13h 30min |
14h 5min |
| Charging time: |
3h 33min |
4h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~189 kWh |
~190 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model S 75 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben, Hohe Börde (10 min, 48% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Auetal Nord, Auetal (22 min, 11% → 37%)
-
Stop 3:
Gütersloh Nord, Gütersloh (56 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle, Düren (28 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Q8 NORD, Verlaine (41 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest, La Sentinelle (56 min, 10% → 75%)
- Arrival: Paris
Tesla Model S 90 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Telekom Opelstraße, Isernhagen (14 min, 13% → 27%)
-
Stop 2:
Auetal Nord, Auetal (27 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
Gütersloh Nord, Gütersloh (66 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle, Düren (34 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Q8 NORD, Verlaine (48 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest, La Sentinelle (51 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesla Supercharger, Senlis (10 min, 10% → 35%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Tesla Model S 75 Won
The Tesla Model S 75 achieved a 35-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 90 on this 1052km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 3h 33min vs 4h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~244 kWh vs ~255 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons