In our Berlin to Riga EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 10 minutes, completing the 1046km route in 14h 9min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 14h 9min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 27min
- Energy: ~234 kWh
- Distance: 1046km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
14h 9min |
14h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 27min |
1h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~188 kWh |
~188 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OTO Park Handlowy (17 min, 21% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka (33 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
Circle K (27 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 4:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OTO Park Handlowy (13 min, 12% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Krauz Oil (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka (40 min, 20% → 87%)
-
Stop 4:
Norfa XL Bernotiškės (22 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (11 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 10-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1046km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 27min vs 1h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons