In our Berlin to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 49 minutes, completing the 1045km route in 13h 30min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 30min (49 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 48min
- Energy: ~192 kWh
- Distance: 1045km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
13h 30min |
14h 19min |
| Charging time: |
48min |
1h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~188 kWh |
~188 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OTO Park Handlowy (10 min, 35% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (28 min, 17% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OTO Park Handlowy (13 min, 12% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Krauz Oil (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka (40 min, 20% → 87%)
-
Stop 4:
Norfa XL Bernotiškės (22 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (11 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 49-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1045km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 48min vs 1h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons