In our Berlin to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 8 minutes, completing the 1511km route in 14h 42min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 42min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~247 kWh
- Distance: 1511km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
14h 42min |
14h 50min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
54min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~272 kWh |
~272 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle, Kinding (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Raststation Europabrücke, Schönberg im Stubaital (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Mantova Village, Bagnolo San Vito (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Marktschorgast (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße, Ingolstadt (10 min, 31% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle, Gries am Brenner (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Electra Old Wild West, San Giorgio Bigarello (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 8-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1511km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~247 kWh vs ~277 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons