In our Berlin to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Standard Range by 91 minutes, completing the 1511km route in 14h 42min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 42min (91 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~247 kWh
- Distance: 1511km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Standard Range |
| Travel time |
14h 42min |
16h 13min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
2h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~272 kWh |
~269 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle, Kinding (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Raststation Europabrücke, Schönberg im Stubaital (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Mantova Village, Bagnolo San Vito (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Rome
Ford Capri Standard Range Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
HEM Tankstelle, Schleiz (13 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Schnaittach (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße, Ingolstadt (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Restaurant Gut Rettenberg am Golfplatz, Iffeldorf (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (18 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Eni Paganella Ovest, Stazione di Lavis (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Electra Old Wild West, San Giorgio Bigarello (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Cantagallo Ovest, Casalecchio di Reno (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (16 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 10:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (15 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 91-minute advantage over Ford Capri Standard Range on this 1511km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 2h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~247 kWh vs ~250 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons