In our Berlin to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Maxus MIFA 9 by 105 minutes, completing the 1511km route in 14h 42min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 42min (105 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~247 kWh
- Distance: 1511km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Maxus MIFA 9 |
| Travel time |
14h 42min |
16h 27min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
2h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~272 kWh |
~268 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle, Kinding (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Raststation Europabrücke, Schönberg im Stubaital (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Mantova Village, Bagnolo San Vito (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Rome
Maxus MIFA 9 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Frankenwald West, Berg (11 min, 15% → 41%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Schnaittach (13 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße, Ingolstadt (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße, München (18 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (20 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Eni Paganella Ovest, Stazione di Lavis (15 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Electra Old Wild West, San Giorgio Bigarello (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 8:
Cantagallo Ovest, Casalecchio di Reno (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 9:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (19 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 10:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (17 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 105-minute advantage over Maxus MIFA 9 on this 1511km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 2h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~247 kWh vs ~378 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons