In our Berlin to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 41 minutes, completing the 1511km route in 14h 42min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 42min (41 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~247 kWh
- Distance: 1511km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
14h 42min |
15h 23min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
1h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~272 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle, Kinding (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Raststation Europabrücke, Schönberg im Stubaital (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Mantova Village, Bagnolo San Vito (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Schnaittach (12 min, 19% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße, München (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (20 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Garda Ovest, Cavaion Veronese (19 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (12 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (11 min, 10% → 39%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 41-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1511km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 1h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~247 kWh vs ~263 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons